Showing posts with label Cathode Ray Tube. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cathode Ray Tube. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Salvation! (1987)

Nearly two decades before they would go on to menace each other in the tense first act of Cronenberg's A History of Violence, Viggo Mortensen and Stephen McHattie could be found menacing each other in the somewhat less tense Salvation!, a long forgotten satire of televangelism from the deepest bowels of the MTV generation. Needless to say, it failed to rocket either of them to superstardom.

Stuck in an extra crappy section of Staten Island, Viggo plays a motorcycle riding thug and recently laid off factory worker. He trudges home to his vacuous, proselytizing wife (played by LA punk rocker and real life Mrs. Viggo*, Exene Cervenka) and her preening sister. In her few moments of lucidity while being mesmerized by televangelism, she insists that the 'family' will be perfectly fine.
And he sayeth "Five Dollar Footlong" Amen.

McHattie, whose recent performance in Pontypool has revealed him as one of cinema's most shamefully underutilized assets, plays the shady cathode-ray preacher with a penchant for booze and pornography. His fire and brimstone tirades are easily the film's strongest feature, which is a good thing considering how much of the runtime they fill. Most of the first 'act' is simply him on TV juxtaposed with Viggo's dysfunctional family bickering. It's as though the movie had a narrator that got religion right before shooting and decided to run with it.
[Insert 'Married with Children' and/or Ghostbusters 2 joke here]

It's almost always a bad omen for a movie's pacing when it feels the need to punctuate itself with title cards. (Things that are acceptable: "Tuesday", "Berlin, 1943", "28 Days Later", and anything from The Shining.) Salvation! is broken up into sections with names like 'dream' and 'nightmare', but the chapter names do little to alleviate the mental whiplash induced by such radical shifts in plot and tone. After the first section, wherein Viggo hollers at his wife, loses his job, and hollers at his wife some more, the film shifts to the seedy reverend, who practices his next sermon before being interrupted by Viggo's hot sister-in-law, who is stuck in the rain with a non-functioning car. She quickly seduces him, despite his suspicion that it is a blackmail scheme. Then the movie devolves into an erotic music video. Eventually, as the reverend fantasizes about a bizarre, semi-wholesome life with the little tart, she starts lip syncing to the soundtrack and it becomes explicitly a music video.
A really messed up music video, too.

Viggo finally shows up to shake the cobwebs off the daydreaming film's narrative; he's got some sort of extortion scheme underway, though he might just be jealous of McHattie getting action with his wife's very covetable sister. Things almost coalesce into a semi-coherent cat & mouse thriller, only it turns out that Viggo's plan is to force his wife into the reverend's show and take half the profits. (It's a lot like my elaborate ruse to kidnap and torture Ted Danson so that he and my dad could be squash partners.) Despite its painfully obvious brilliance, the scheme is ultimately thwarted by McHattie's second escape through a bathroom window onto his giant, neon lawn-cross. Too bad they weren't prepared for him to try the exact same thing again.
The reverend successfully escapes, only to get picked up as a hitchhiker by the very woman Viggo was attempting to foist on him.

*Title card: "Salvation"*

The 'plan' is successful and everybody is all friendly and in cahoots now! What the hell was the last forty-five minutes for? Why didn't they just send her to talk to him in the first place? Why is the movie essentially starting the plot over with less than 15 minutes left? What trick could it possibly have up its sleeve to wrap up all the loose ends that only just now appeared? (Spoiler alert: it has no trick.)
Rather than answer those questions, the third act is cool with being a confusing blur. Making sense is for square movies, Salvation! just wants to get itself over with so it can go back to smoking weed and spinning Joy Division albums. So it has Viggo and his cronies pick up groupies for the good reverend. Then they all play poker. Some fat-cat at a pool party suggests the reverend has a future in politics. The team argues over how to stay organized while raiding viewer donations from the mail bag. "Postcards on the floor; envelopes on the desk!" All while his new co-host picks up the religious monologue slack.
The reverend and Viggo's now ex-wife ultimately squeeze him and their other co-conspirators out of the scheme, but cannot agree on how to split up their profits. She suddenly reverses her characterization and cunningly suggests giving the disputed monies to a homeless shelter. (So her almost instantaneous corruption also made her smart?) He changes the subject by proclaiming "showtime". There is one more brief televised sermon, a Christian rock music video, and the movie ends.
That's it. McHattie gives one last speech, perfectly mimicking a fraying televangelist while saying absolutely nothing of real relevance to the gossamer wisps of storyline floating around. Also, in the context of a spiritual experience, he mentions having 'intercourse' with his new sidekick; an out of place line that rips itself away from the surrounding speech to make you momentarily wonder if perhaps the movie is smarter than you are giving it credit for. At least until you see the midget devil in the final scene.
With the glaring exception of an ending, Salvation! contains within itself all the individual components of a movie, but they never unite into anything even remotely resembling a plot. There are characters. Those characters speak dialog and have dramatic conflicts. Those conflicts even elicit faint implications of character growth. The problem is that the film has absolutely no idea how much time to spend on a particular scene, or how that scene should flow into and impact the scenes that follow. As Homer Simpson once said, "It's just a bunch of stuff that happened." Crucial moments are glossed over or skipped entirely, while endless minutes are spent on Viggo riding his motorcycle across Staten Island. (The least friendly place in America!) The third act might as well just be the cliff notes of an entirely different movie.
Lay the blame at the feet of writer/director Beth B, who apparently is far more at home in the world of music videos than feature films. It looks like a movie, it sounds like a movie, but it certainly doesn't flow like a movie. On the bright side, Ms. B's MTV skill-set gives the film interesting (but thoroughly dated) production design and music. New Order practically scored the thing, with the gaps filled in by a variety of mid-'80s post-punk. (Most of it written by either Arthur Baker or the director herself.) Clearly the best track is "You Can't Blackmail Jesus", an alt-country gospel sung by McHattie himself. That alone makes the movie better than Valentines Day or The Rats.
During nighttime scenes at the reverend's mansion (probably %50 of the film) the lighting alternates between electric blues and violets, and would probably be impressive looking outside the confines of a two decade old VHS tape. Otherwise it just looks like electric Smurfs are being tossed violently at the camera in every shot. Like every other aspect of the film, the cinematography can only hint at the theoretical existence of an awesome film that came very close to being made.
Salvation! certainly did one thing right (besides McHattie's phantom country music career) and that was creating a perfect storm of cinematic irrelevance. Certainly the post-punks and proto-goths of the middle 1980s were itching to knock the self righteous would-be censors of the 'religious right' down a couple of pegs, and the film's portrayal of a hypocritical televangelist who pockets his flock's money while watching porn seems to have at least shocked and appalled most of the people who have bothered to post "user reviews" of it online. The problem was that reality came along and stole the film's thunder. In the wake of the Jim Bakker and Jimmy Swaggart scandals, the idea of a corrupt preacher of the cathode ray tube became passé. By 1990 people practically expected them to drop like flies out of grace, and today the fallen televangelist character has long passed beyond cliché into archetype. It's awfully hard to knock someone down a peg when they've already gotten drunk, passed out, and fallen completely off the pegboard (or wherever else these metaphorical pegs may be inserted). So after going out of its way to make numerous and powerful enemies, the film's satire ends up getting undercut by current events. Combine that with the fact that it's an incoherent mess, and you've got a powerful recipe for being stuck on VHS well into the 21st century and beyond.
I'm sure it's scant consolation to Beth B's abortive career in feature length narrative cinema, but her combination of unwieldyconventional filmmaking, a quality '80s soundtrack, and a cast that was literally decades ahead of its time has rendered the film irresistible to weirdos like me who buy VHS tapes off of eBay purely because they are covered by a veil of obscurity as intriguing as it is absolute.
*They once made a baby and have long since split up.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Shocker: No More Mr. Nice Guy (1989)

No more Mr. Clea-ea-ea-ea-ea-aaachoo.

With the recent release of the trailer for the Last House on the Left remake, it seems like as good a time as any to go over the works of horror-director and New Age weirdo: Wes Craven. (Seriously, watch interviews of him when he discusses "spirituality." Total nutter.)

Mr. Craven has one of the most illustrious careers in horror cinema. He practically invented the modern splatter film with his early work in the '70s, he created one of horror's most enduring and recognizable icons in Nightmare on Elmstreet's Freddy Krueger, and even reinvented/reinvigorated/ruined (depending on who you ask) the slasher with Scream.

In the late '80s, Craven was riding high on Nightmare's success, but despite helping write the second sequel, he felt that New Line Cinema wasn't giving him enough scratch. Obviously, the time was right for a new franchise. The magically powered, non-corporeal, super slasher bit had worked like gangbusters for Krueger, so Craven must have been hoping that lightning would strike twice with his new series: Shocker. (Pun extra intended.)
The movie begins with some good old cathode-ray-tube stock footage footage, and the cleverly titled, brain-rocking original song, "Shocker", by The Dudes of Wrath, an '80s metal super-group. A convenient newscast explains that a serial murderer is terrorizing the town by murdering entire families. All that is known is that he is "male and savagely powerful." Craven's masterstroke is that by making the boob-tube his anchor motif for the film, he can get away with the most obvious and clumsy exposition by hiding it in the many Greek choruses newscasts sprinkled throughout.
Meanwhile, high school football star Jonathan Parker (the acting debut of Hancock director, Peter Berg) gets a concussion during practice; ostensibly because he is distracted by the sight of his hot girlfriend, but most likely to avoid running into the Steadicam operator or 1st AC.
The head injury results in some Nightmare-esque dream sequences about the killer, who is soon revealed to be limping TV repair man, Horace Pinker (the X-Files' Mitch Pileggi). Jonathan's father is the lead detective on the case, resulting in Pinker murdering their entire family, as well as John's girlfriend. John uses his newfound psychic gifts to lead his father to the killer's lair, and eventually to catching him in the middle of one of his trademark home invasions.
After some 4th Amendment violations, a surprisingly Mirror's Edge like rooftop chase and the world's fastest capital punishment trial, Pinker is ready for the electric chair. Megadeth mangles Alice Cooper's "No More Mr. Nice Guy," while the guards comment on Pinker's last request: a TV set, which he promptly uses to contact Satan and/or the gods of electricity. (How he got a Satanic Bible, candles, and a set of jumper cables, will forever remain a mystery.) As Pinker ritualistically electrocutes himself, giant Rolling Stones lips burst from the TV and proclaim "You got it, Baaaby," which I guess means his plan worked.
The guards resuscitate Pinker so that he can be alive and well for his imminent death, which naturally doesn't go as planned. First he reveals that he is Jonathan's abusive biological father, then he transforms into a body jumping being of pure energy instead of dying. Unfortunately, Craven seems to believe that their blood relation is enough explanation for Johnathan's precognitive psychic link, as now that Pinker has escaped his mortal body, they never ever mention it again. Also notable in the massive-leaps-of-logic category, is that Pinker's trademark overdone limp follows him through the electrical spirit world to manifest itself in all of his hosts.
Note: Next time I threaten to injure one of my co-workers, I'm going to say something along the lines of, "I'm gonna hit you so hard your immortal soul will get bruised, so when you are put in the electric chair after making a deal with the devil and escape from your body into a state of pure energy that can possess and control others, your host bodies will have black eyes too. Yeah. So there."
After an afternoon of Jason Goes to Hell/The Hidden/Fallen style body swapping mayhem at the park (the highlight of which is a bulldozer riding, 8-year-old girl with the mouth of a sailor) Jonathan teams up with his football buddies, Ted Raimi, and the spirit of his dead girlfriend to take Pinker down. Unfortunately, the football guys can't come up with a more advanced plan than "break the sucker's neck."
Pinker takes control of the neck breakage obsessed coach, who had been sent on a videogame style fetch quest to get some snorkeling equipment, and kills Ted Raimi before being forced out with the help of some soul-battle coaching from Jonathan. (Despite the brilliant line "I eat this wimp's willpower for breakfast, John-Bo.") Now reduced to a cheesy video effect, he attempts to jump into Jonathan's body as a last resort. Luckily, John's dead girlfriend shows up with the Care Bear Stare, forcing him to escape into a wall outlet.

The natural assumption at this point in the movie is that Pinker will start attacking via toasters and curling irons, but he quickly returns to form by jumping into Jonathan's dad, who was attempting to turn on a light. He then chases John up a giant TV antenna, only to escape into the airwaves and resume his murderous rampage as a magic TV ghost. (Hopefully the DTV transition will prevent this from ever happening in real life.) Of course, since the movie has already past the 90 minute mark and had a tense rooftop climax, all the killing happens off camera and is merely related to us by (you guessed it) a TV newscast.
The stage is now set for the final confrontation, as Jonathan sets up a brilliant plan to chase his father through television itself, in order to force him into the real world where he can be hurt. (Sound familiar?) The battle rages across World War 2 documentaries, Leave it to Beaver, Alice Cooper videos, boxing matches, and news reports. After atomic blast footage knocks them into some fat people's living room, the movie finally crosses the line from "goofy" to "bat-shit insane." How Jonathan, who remains a flesh and blood person, is able to follow his father into the TV world is, once again, not explained. The illogic culminates with Jonathan torturing Pinker with a magic remote control and fleeing back into his room through the lens of a TV camera while his buddies destroy the town's power supply. (As Red Dawn taught us, high school football teams are always excellent at guerrilla warfare tactics.)


I don't get it. Was Pinker's deal with TV Satan to make him an immortal energy being, or to replace the laws of physics with cartoon rules, ala Paprika?

Shocker is an interesting bird none the less. The soundtrack rules, and it certainly makes a good case for the criminal under use of Mitch Pileggi. Aside from X-Files, all I can remember seeing him in was an insurance commercial I once saw where he was petting a dog. Perhaps it's just bald-guy solidarity. (We frequently have to band together to defeat evil leagues of eugenicists.)On the other hand, the film's foibles are legion. It's too long, it's poorly paced, it's not even a tiny bit scary, and it makes fuck-all sense 99% of the time. It doesn't even have any memorable deaths. All of this can be traced back to Shocker's older, more successful sibling, Elmstreet, the movie that it desperately wants to be.

Craven's biggest mistake was in trying to create a franchise rather than a movie. We all know how successful sequels have been with our fadish, sheeplike movie-going public. After all, Elmstreet, alone wrangled six follow ups, a crossover with Friday the 13th, a TV series, and a small landfill's worth in merchandising. Despite all that, Craven made the first Freddy Krueger movie to stand alone: Freddy makes some sweet kills, the heroine uncovers what he is and the terrible secret of his backstory, and she has a "final girl" showdown with him. It's not Citizen Kane, but it was effective for the time and launched the above mentioned ultra-franchise. Shocker, by contrast, wastes a great deal of time doubling as Horace Pinker's origin story. He's a mere mortal for the entire first act, and the movie spends most of the rest of its running time setting up his countless powers and establishing vague rules, with the tacit promise that he would be returning in numerous sequels to actually do memorable things with said powers.
I feel like I'm being too hard on the film; demanding that it follow the stale, rigid structure of the slasher when all it wants to do is give Timothy Leary cameos and play by its own rules. I guess I am, but it is only because Shocker shows so much promise: good music, decent acting, and a premise just brimming with possibilities. Also, if you can look beyond the total illogic of the final battle, it is undeniably awesome in both concept and execution. If they would have opened the movie with Pinker's execution, reduced the amount of body jumping in favor of Pinker attacking with appliances or other electrical powers, and come up with some sort of explanation for how the hero can also travel into the TV set (other than "because we did something similar in Nightmare on Elmstreet and his dead girlfriend gave him a magic necklace that hurts the villain for some reason") Shocker could have been really, really awesome. (While we're at it, just drop the ghost girlfriend, or ggf, altogether.)

More science, less mysticism, Wes. Go read Elegant Universe, then write me another "Like Freddy, only with less magic" movie. Just don't get your hopes up about a sequel.

-KnarfPS. Rumor has it that Shocker will be remade in the near future, with Henry Rollins as the titular villain. That is just crazy enough to work.